Nonprofit Help - A Future For Irrelevant and Duplicative Organizations?

I was sitting in a meeting of young professionals lastUsing an example of a nonprofit jobs training
week and the subject of nonprofits, grant funding,organization, 'outputs' would typically measure the
grant writing, and fundraising arose. In addition, thenumber of participants in the program, along with
continued subject of interest to me (ethics,program costs, etc.; however, to make the move
governance, and accountability) was also mentioned.toward 'outcomes' the organization would need to
But, I found the thoughts of the group of youngtrack the number of program participants (outputs) that
professionals to be fascinating, well-timed, and veryactually (a) successfully completed the training, (b)
thoughtful: those nonprofit organizations that arefound jobs that pay a living wage, and (c) stayed
'irrelevant' or 'duplicative' are no longer needed in ouremployed over a given period of time. Now, that's
communities, are drawing funds away from other,accountability!
arguably more viable, needs and should not beLet's take a look at the two obvious ends of the
expected to survive.spectrum of organizations in the nonprofit sector.
Interesting!The 'government' (federal, state, and local), by the
As the discussion progressed, it was clear that theprocess it uses to distribute funds, is an enabler of
young professionals truly have adopted 'social media''output-based' measures. A good example is the
(LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) as their means forlong-standing concept of the "community action
communicating. They do not attend the meetings - noragency" and its myriad of funding mechanisms that
do they join the community organizations - that were'automatically' flow to these groups every year. Many
the mainstays of the past. This phenomenon placesof the community action agency funds are actually
large numbers of non-profit organizations in jeopardy.codified in federal and state law. Opponents of
Where are tomorrow's leaders? How does thecommunity action agencies would argue the very point
mechanism of 'social marketing' find its way into theof 'irrelevance' and 'duplication' arrived long ago. Make
governance process required of nonprofits? Countlessno mistake that accountability is enforced by means of
articles have been written about the scarce resourcesaudits of community action agency programs, but the
that continue to spiral downward for organizations inaudit can only be as good as the required measures.
the nonprofit (charitable) sector.While it is impossible to tally the numbers, considerable
And, thoughtfully, this group of young professionalsamounts of funding are not creating the desired
believes 'survival of the fittest' is very appropriate,outcomes. It is time to demand accountability from all
particularly in this economic climate.nonprofits.
When you stop and think about it, the youngConversely, individual donors and foundations are free
professionals are correct - even by the standards ofto make contributions to nonprofit agencies of their
the 'old timers' (like this author). We have watchedchoice, using whatever measures they deem
nonprofit organizations proliferate, compete, fuss andappropriate. We would advocate both increased
fight, refuse to collaborate, and provide 'services' thataccountability by nonprofits and increased
are no longer beneficial by the community. Curiously,accountability by funders.
communities have not proactively rid themselves ofShould we ponder merging similar nonprofits?
irrelevant and duplicative nonprofits. Ostensibly this isMost discussions that I have been involved in over the
because even the most irrelevant and duplicativeyears that concern 'duplication' of activities among
nonprofit organizations still have some modicum ofsimilar nonprofits have predominately centered on the
interested supporters (and funders).issue of 'job protection' for the executive director.
So, what does The Center for Ethics, Governance,While this is entirely predictable, it should be recognized
and Accountability (CEGA) recommend?that the issues driving the missions of nonprofits are
Well, for starters, our entire focus at CEGA hasnot easy to solve and there may never be enough
always been on ethics, governance, and accountabilitypeople to get the job done. Accordingly, the merging of
- and so it shall remain. If a community or a funder or asimilar (duplicative) programs and agencies seems to
nonprofit organization were to focus on thebe a very reasonable way of addressing the
'accountability' aspect of the equation, would not thatcommunity needs and the individual protectionism
identify issues of 'irrelevance' and 'duplication' amongamong executive directors and even board members
the nonprofit sector?who have long-standing ties with certain organizations,
Sure it would!despite the possibility that those organizations are now
Nonprofits are notoriously skeptical of measuringeither 'irrelevant' or 'duplicative' to the objective
outcomes - not outputs - but outcomes. Why? Simplereviewer.
answer: outcomes speak directly to the viability andSo, where do we go from here?
the success of the nonprofit as measured against itsWithout a doubt, the discussion among the young
mission. CEGA advocates a proactive approach toprofessionals in the meeting I attended was
accountability and we argue that those nonprofits whothought-provoking. There is no better time than right
can demonstrate excellence in accountability (andnow for nonprofits to look internally, get their house in
ethics and governance) should stand above theirorder, cooperate with their peer organizations, and
peers in the increasingly difficult fundraising arena.conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the
What is the difference between 'outcomes' andprivilege awarded them through their IRS charitable
'outputs' as tools of accountability?designation.