Measuring Training Programs: Cost Vs Benefit

For decades companies have been struggling with theFor many development of measurement and
real costs,benefits and return-on-investment of trainingevaluation tools sounds like additional costs and
costs. Withincreasing online learning opportunities,expense to the organization. Companies who allocate
organizations are finding their focus shifting froma small, but fixed percentage of the training budget to
providing costly onsite training programs to the use ofthis purpose will find themselves able to effectively
new tools and technology now available. Companiesmeasure the effectiveness for their overall investment
need to understand and apply the business analytics inin training. One study found that organizations who
order to fully appreciate the effectiveness and impactadopt this model, and who spend US $2-10 per
that e-learning and training offers.employee on learning analytics reported noticeable
Companies invest large amounts of money, resourcesimprovements in the measurability and return on
and time intraining. According to a 2002 ASTD Stateinvestment.
of the Industry Reportwhere over 375 majorCompanies will need to justify the costs associated
corporations were surveyed, companieswith measuring learning by identifying the business
spentbetween one (1) and three (3) percent of theirimpact and risk of not training its employees. This could
total payroll ontraining. This translated to a per-personbe quantified by fines, or profit loss as a result of being
basis of more thanout of compliance with laws or standards. Often times
US $700 per employee per year. In cutting-edgethis can result in fines levied against the company or
companies thatsignificantly increases to US $1400 oreven lawsuits or other forms of profit loss.
more per person per year.In healthcare, for example, lack of compliance with
If training expenses are viewed as a percentage ofcorrectlycollecting, coding and reporting cancer
the company'sprofits, then the training budget couldincidence could have far-reaching impact on budget
represent as much asdollars spent not only in the training and operational
5 - 20% of the total profit margin. With increasingcosts associated with the Cancer Registry
costsassociated with travel and lodging, as well asdepartment, but could also negate the costs
increasing costsand expenses to register and attendassociated with cancer program development and
meetings or to develop in-house training programs,community outreach programs. Although program
training budget costs are undboutedly going todevelopment and outreach programs have the ability
increase, which only underscores the need to justify itsto compete with the consumer's dollars, all this could
cost.be for naught if the required reporting is not done
In order to effectively measure training programs,accurately and in compliance with the State or
companiesare faced with three critical issues:accreditation program standards. Training programs for
efficiency, effectiveness, and compliance. Every majorthe Cancer Registry can ensure that the data
decision made regarding training falls into one of thesemanagement processes are appropriately managed.
three areas. Fortunately, each of these three areasSo, in summary, companies should be focusing on the
can be benchmarked and measured.developmentand measurement of their learning
The ASTD 2002 study reported that only one-third ofprograms. The investment inlearning analytics will
companiesmeasured the effectiveness of learning andoutweigh the risks of inadequate training. Success for
that 12% or less attempted to measure job andany organization will directly depend on their
business impact of their training programs. Why?employee's understanding of their products, services,
Interestingly enough the top reason why companies failoperations and policies. Employees must be thoroughly
to measure training is that they lack the experience,trained in compliance, standards, confidentiality,
tools and infrastructure to do so.non-disclosure and other legally sensitive areas of the
It is impossible to improve or effectively optimize thecompany. And, companies must be able to track and
trainingprogram if it is not benchmarked or measured.measure this using effective learning analytics.
Training should be measured and evaluated just asPUBLISHING RIGHTS:
companies measure productivity, profit or quality. ThereYou have permission to publish this article electronically,
have been many scorecards, dashboards, algorithmsin print, in your ebook or on your website, free of
or metrics developed for this purpose.charge, as long as the author's information and web
If one considers the total training investment perlink are included at the bottom of the article and the
person in thecompany (see above), the question isarticle is not changed, modified or altered in any way.
how much should they spendon measurement andThe web link should be active when the article is
evaluation? One, five or ten percent? Looking back atreprinted on a web site or in an email. The author
the ASTD 2002 study of best practices, we find thatwould appreciate an email indicating you wish to
most companies spend 40-50% of their total trainingpostthis article to a website, and the link to where it is
dollars on content development, 8-10% onposted.
infrastructure and the remaining resources on salariesCopyright 2005, M. A. Webb.
and facilities costs.